the military?
Now the military
must have strong legs.
And what about heads?
Why should we have heads?
They think for us, and we just execute.
Legs are important for us, just legs,
to take to the heels in time.
Aren't you afraid to speak so
to a total stranger?
But you don't know my name.
I can easily find it out,
as you face sticks in the memory.
Are you for real?
Shit, I've always thought
that my face is quite common.
Doesn't matter.
You'll have to write a report
exposing me, then they'll
have to find a second witness,
and so time will pass
and it'll be all over.
And not those ones, but these ones
will be putting us on trial.
And you, diplomats, will go first.
You killed, you destroyed, you burnt,
and we will be brought to trial?
We executed orders.
It was the SS that burnt, we fought.
Has anyone invented a new war
technique - no burning, no victims?
War is a necessity, this way or the other.
But not such a dumb one.
This was is a war of amateurs.
He decided he can fight
without academies, just by intuition.
He decided that he was the only one
who knew what we all needed.
He decided that he was the only one
who loved the great Germany,
and we all think of nothing else
but how to sell it over
to the circumcised Bolshevik Cossacks.
What are you saying?
Circumcised Cossacks. It's something
new. I've never heard of it.
You can expect anything from the Reds.
By the way, from the Americans, too.
I've been fighting them
for a year.
Their own military equipment will
destroy these idiots.
They think they can win a war
exceptionally with air-raids.
They'll build up their technical might
and end up bogged down in it.
It will destroy them like rust.
They think it's permissible for them
to do whatever they want.
The Reds think so, because they're
barbaric and poverty-stricken.
The Americans think so,
because they're too rich.
Therefore wars are a necessity.
No link.
What?
I say, there's no link,
your hypothesis doesn't hold together.
But it does.
The state is like people.
They hate anything static.
Borders oppress them.
They need dynamics, it's self-evident.
Dynamics are war.
But if you, fucking diplomats,
mess it up again,
you'll be destroyed,
to the last man.
We executed orders.
We are soldiers like you,
the Fuhrer's soldiers.
Come on, stop fooling around.
The Fuhrer's soldiers!
Ajunior officer
who stole his general's boots!
I'm afraid to speak to you,
General.
Don't lie.
Now the whole Germany is speaking
like this, or at least, thinking.
And what about guys from the
Hitler Jugend?
Do they think likewise when they go
against Russian tanks?
They die, saying
<>.
Fanaticism will never bring
ultimate victory.
Fanaticism tires people.
And then this very fanaticism
dissolves in the loser's thoughts
and behavior.
Fanatics can win only at initial
stages.
But they can never hold this victory,
as they'll get tired of themselves.
Then why won't you
raise your division?
- A corps.
- The more so.
Why won't you surrender?
And the family?
And the fanatics in the headquarters?
And cowards, for whom it's easier
to fight, believing in a mythical victory,
than go to the allies' camp?
But you can issue an order.
They normally order to die.
But no army in the world
has ever issued orders to preserve life,
surrendering to the enemy.
- But if you get such an order?
- From whom?
From this neurasthenic?
He's dragging us all
into the grave together with him.
It's scary to die alone.
If all in a bunch- it's easy,
you can even have fun.
But if you get such an order
from Keitel?
He has an ass instead of a head.
He's a secretary, not a military man.
Okay, then your
commander-in chief in Italy.
Kesselring?
He'll never agree to it.
Why not?
He came out of Goring's
headquarters,
and it's obligatory that the one, who
works under a leader's supervision,
loses initiative.
But gains skills how to dodge.
He becomes an